free social media buttons

Inclined Bed Therapy

Inclined Bed Therapy (IBT)

Sleeping Inclined To Restore and Support Your Health For Free. Fascinating Science, Discovery, History and Medical Research In Circulation And Posture, by Andrew K Fletcher

 

Latest From The Forum

    • file
    • The Heart Is Not A Pump
    • THE HEART IS NOT A PUMP: A REFUTATION OF THE PRESSURE PROPULSION PREMISE OF HEART FUNCTION by Ralph Marinelli 1; Branko Fuerst 2; Hoyte van der Zee 3; Andrew McGinn 4; William Marinelli 5 1. Rudolf Steiner Research Center, Royal Oak, MI 2. Dept. of Anesthesiology, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY 3. Dept. of Anesthesiology and Physiology, Albany Medical College, NY 4. Cardiovascular Consultants Ltd., Minneapolis, MN. Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, MN 5. Hennipen County Medical Center and Dept. of Medicine, University of Minnesota, MN Abstract In 1932, Bremer of Harvard filmed the blood in the very early embryo circulating in self-propelled mode in spiralling streams before the heart was functioning. Amazingly, he was so impressed with the spiralling nature of the blood flow pattern that he failed to realize that the phenomena before him had demolished the pressure propulsion principle. Earlier in 1920, Steiner, of the Goetheanum in Switzerland had pointed out in lectures to medical doctors that the heart was not a pump forcing inert blood to move with pressure but that the blood was propelled with its own biological momentum, as can be seen in the embryo, and boosts itself with "induced" momenta from the heart. He also stated that the pressure does not cause the blood to circulate but is caused by interrupting the circulation. Experimental corroboration of Steiner's concepts in the embryo and adult is herein presented. Introduction The fact that the heart by itself is incapable of sustaining the circulation of the blood was known to physicians of antiquity. They looked for auxiliary forces of blood movement in various types of `etherisation' and `pneumatisation' or ensoulement of the blood on its passage through the heart and lungs. With the dawn of modern science and over the past three hundred years, such concepts became untenable. The mechanistic concept of the heart as a hydraulic pump prevailed and became firmly established around the middle of the nineteenth century. The heart, an organ weighing about three hundred grams, is supposed to `pump' some eight thousand liters of blood per day at rest and much more during activity, without fatigue. In terms of mechanical work this represents the lifting of approximately 100 pounds one mile high! In terms of capillary flow, the heart is performing an even more prodigious task of `forcing' the blood with a viscosity five times greater than that of water through millions of capillaries with diameters often smaller than the red blood cells themselves! Clearly, such claims go beyond reason and imagination. Due to the complexity of the variables involved, it has been impossible to calculate the true peripheral resistance even of a single organ, let alone of the entire peripheral circulation. Also, the concept of a centralized pressure source (the heart) generating excessive pressure at its source, so that sufficient pressure remains at the remote capillaries, is not an elegant one. Our understanding and therapy of the key areas of cardiovascular pathophysiology, such as septic shock, hypertension and myocardial ischemia are far from complete. The impact of spending billions of dollars on cardiovascular research using an erroneous premise is enormous. In relation to this, the efforts to construct a satisfactory artificial heart have yet to bear fruit. Within the confines of contemporary biological and medical thinking, the propulsive force of the blood remains a mystery. If the heart really does not furnish the blood with the total motive force, where is the source of the auxiliary force and what is its nature? The answer to those questions will foster a new level of understanding of the phenomena of life in the biological sciences and enable physicians to rediscover the human being which, all too often, many feel they have lost. www.rsarchive.org/RelArtic/Marinelli/
    • In IBT Forum / General discussion
    • Author Andrew
    • 6 days 23 hours ago

Flat bedrest has been tested on many people as a model for microgravity conditions in Spaceflight. Also head down tilt has been tested to induce some of the harmful effects of living in a reduced gravity environment.

We curently are analysing the effects of humidity, water, saline, and dry climate on the skin, particularly relating to psoriasis .
http://www.psoriasis.org/forum/showthread.php?p=301797&posted=1#post301797

Presumably gravity or the lack of it according to my theory should show up in NASA data. A search revealed the following interesting reported skin conditions. Presumably, no astronauts would have psoriasis prior to micro gravity flight conditions, due to the shed skin cells floating around inside the craft. However, it would appear that micro gravity did induce psoriasis and a startling number of other skin related problems, suggesting again that gravity plays a vital roll in health.

Flat bed rest and head down bed rest have been used and still are being used by countries involved in space flight. Why?  Because they can induce all of the degenerative effects shown below without taking healthy people into space at a fraction of the cost.


Overview
This document, prepared by the NASA Medical Policy Board (MPB), describes medical and clinical policies and related procedures for manned space missions. First issued as the Medical Policy Board Handbook in 1995, this is the fifth revision of this document. This reflects NASA’s medical policy for strategic planning and references an increased knowledge in evidence-based space medicine gained from the ongoing human space flight program.
<Table 1
Medical Events in Shuttle Program Reported by Frequency from Postflight Medical Debrief, STS-26–STS-74
(1988–1995)

Condition Frequency Percent
Facial fullness 226 81.0%
Headache 212 76.0%
Sinus congestion 173 62.0%
Dry skin, irritation, rash 110 39.4%
Eye irritation, dryness, redness 64 22.9%
Foreign body in eye 56 20.1%
Sneezing/coughing 31 11.1%
Sensory changes (e.g., tingly, numbness, unusual sensations) 26 9.3%
URI (common cold, sore throat, sinus headache, hayfever) 24 8.6%
Back muscle pain (excluding “space” backpain) 21 7.5%
Leg/foot muscle pain 21 7.5%
Cuts 19 6.8%
Shoulder/trunk muscle pain 18 6.5%
Hand/arm muscle pain 15 5.4%
Anxiety/annoyance 10 3.6%
Contusions 10 3.6%
Ear problems (predominantly earaches) 8 2.9%
Neck muscle pain 8 2.9%
Stress/tension 8 2.9%
Muscle cramp 7 2.5%
Abrasions 6 2.2%
Fever, chills 6 2.2%
Nosebleed 6 2.2%
Psoriasis, folliculitis, seborrhea 6 2.2%
Low heart rate 5 1.8%
Myoclonic jerks (associated with sleep) 5 1.8%
General muscle pain, fatigue 4 1.4%
Subconjunctival hemorrhage 4 1.4%
Allergic reaction 3 1.1%
Fungal infection 3 1.1%
Hoarseness 3 1.1%
Concentrated or “dark” urine 2 0.7%
Decreased concentration 2 0.7%
Dehydration 2 0.7%
Inhalation of foreign body 2 0.7%
Subcutaneous skin infection 2 0.7%
Chemical in eye (buffer solution) 1 0.4%
Fever blisters 1 0.4%
Mood elevation 1 0.4%
Phlebitis 1 0.4%
Viral gastrointestinal disease 1 0.4%
Table 1: Medical Events in Shuttle Program Reported by Frequency from Postflight Medical Debrief,
STS-26 Through STS-74 (1988–1995). JSC Publication (EDO Report?)


 

Social Share:

Leave A Tip

Amount: